An Exploration of Female Agency and Feminist Resistance in Rupi Kaur’s milk and honey

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64296/vijir.v1i2.06

Keywords:

Father-child relationship, Psychology, Unconscious, Defense, Oedipus complex

Abstract

Human psychology as well as human relationship is the central element of both human life and literature. Since the father-child relationship is a fundamental aspect of human life, this study is going to explore this dynamic in two different texts from two distinct eras: Wuthering Heights from the 19th century and Sons and Lovers from the 20th century. Psychological upbringing of a child is, profoundly, influenced by the environment that comprises of family atmosphere in the house, cultural context, and, other relationships. Considering the factors, the first focus of this paper will be on assessing the psychology of the fathers and sons in Wuthering Heights, by applying the concepts of ‘unconscious’ (the unconscious is the area of the mind that contains memories, desires, thoughts, and sensations that are not conscious but yet have an impact on the behavior) and ‘defense’ (selective perception, selective memory, denial, avoidance displacement, and projection), and its impact on their relationship. Next concentration will be on to explore the mother controlled father-child relationship in Sons and Lovers. For this, Freud’s theory of Oedipus Complex will be applied to analyze William’s and Paul’s relationship with Mr. Morel. Additionally, the impact of industrial society on worker’s mind and relationship will be highlighted to explore Mr. Morel as a father figure. As the conditions of the two novels are different, a comparative study will be conducted between the mother-dominated father-child relation in Sons and Lovers and father-child bond in Wuthering Heights, which lacks the presence of the mother. As a healthy relationship between father-child is essential for the ideal psychological growth of a child, the outcome of this study will give some valuable suggestions in this regard for our real- life situations.

References

Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Butler, J. (2006). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.

Caldeira, S. (2018). Exploring the Politics of Gender Representation on Instagram: Self-Representations of Femininity. DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 5(1), 23–42. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.11116/digest.5.1.2. Accessed 29 Dec. 2024.

Chuen, L. (2018), Wanting to Feel Seen While Wanting to Feel Safe: Reflections on Technology, Consent, Privacy, and Digital Storytelling as a Kid of Immigrants and a Woman of Colour. GUTS Magazine, 22 Feb. 2018, http://gutsmagazine.ca/wanting to-feel-seen-while-wanting-to-feel-safe/. Accessed 24 Feb. 2018.

Cixous, H., Cohen, K., & Cohen, P. (1976). The Laugh of the Medusa. Signs, 1(4), 875–893. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3173239

Cixous, H. (1997). Sorties: Out and Out: Attacks/ Ways Out/ Forays. Rpt. in The Feminist Reader, 2nd Ed., Catherine Belsey and Jane Moore (Ed.). MA: Blackwell.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. MA: Harvard University Press.

Grant, C. (2011). Fans of Feminism: Re-Writing Histories of Second-Wave Feminism in Contemporary Art. Oxford Art Journal, 34(2), 265–286. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41315381. Accessed 9 Dec. 2024.

Hagerman, K. (2018). A Digital Project of Community and Identity: The Work of Rupi Kaur. Dr. Bruno Cornellier’s Field of Cultural Studies Course Paper.

Handa, A. (2003). Of Silk Saris and Mini-Skirts: South Asian Girls Walk the Tightrope of Culture. Women’s Press of Canada.

Hanson, K. (2016). Literary Lens: “milk and honey. The Review, 4 October 2016, https://udreview.com/literary-lens-milk-and-honey/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2025.

Hooks, B. (1992). Black Looks: Race and Representation. London: Routledge.

Horace. (2015). Poems - Everyman's Library Pocket Poets (P. Quarrie, Ed.). London: Penguin.

Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex Which Is Not One. Trans. Catherine Porter. New York: Cornell University Press.

Jain, A. (2016). A Poet and Rebel: How Insta-Sensation Rupi Kaur Forced Her Way to Global Fame. Inkl, 22 Oct. 2016, www.inkl.com/news/a-poet-and-a-rebel-how-insta-sensation-rupi-kaur-forced-her-way-into-global-bestseller.

Jain, A. (2017). A Poet and a Rebel: How Insta-Sensation Rupi Kaur Forced Her Way to Global Fame. Hindustan Times, 28 June 2017, https://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/a-poet-and-a-rebel-how-instasensation-rupi-kaur-forced-her-way-into-the-global-bestseller-lists/story-DCbkk7EBMxrSjdoFsxQmDM.html. Accessed 25 Feb. 2025.

Joshi, S. (2020). Everyone Said the Literary World Would Laugh at Me, but I Didn’t Care: Rupi Kaur. The Times of India. 13 Dec. 2020, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/everyone-said-the-literary-world-would-laugh-at-me-but-i-didnt-care-rupi-kaur/articleshow/79698748.cms. Accessed 21 Feb. 2025.

Kassam, A. (2016). Interview with Rupi Kaur: There Was No Market for Poetry about Trauma, Abuse and Healing. The Guardian, 26 Aug. 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/26/rupi-kaur-poetry-canada-instagram-banned-photo

Kaur, R. (2025). Poetry Foundation. www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/rupi-kaur. Accessed 4 Feb. 2025.

Kaur, R. (2014). milk and honey. Kansas City: Andrews McMeel Publishing.

Kaur, R (2015). [@rupikaur]. “thank you @instagram for providing me with the exact response my work was created to critique.” Instagram. 15 March 2015, https://www.instagram.com/p/0ovWwJHA6f/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=invalid&ig_rid=d736ef26-4d66-4b63-a890-2948975a5c5d. Accessed 19 May 2024.

Kaur, R. (2025). About Me. https://rupikaur.com/about-me/. Accessed 1 March 2025.

Maher, J. (2018). Can Instagram Make Poems Sell Again? Publishers Weekly. 02 Feb 2018, https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/75976-can-instagram-make-poems-sell-again.html

McNay, L. (2000). Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Moi, T. (2000). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London: Routledge.

Published

2026-06-15